jump to navigation

Moving out and Cashing in April 28, 2017

Posted by hslu in Election, Liberal Media, Obama, US Government.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

The path to riches for any American politicians are quite straigh forward:

Being able to lie is a positive on your resume. If it comes naturally, you are born for the job. You are good at debate in high school and quick on your feet. You start from school board, move on to city council, get into state office, work your way up to Washington DC representing your district, become a governor or Senator and finally throw yourself into the center ring of the presidential circus. If you have what it takes or luck is looking after you, you end up as your party’s presidential candidate. 

Finally, you face your opponent in a few more rounds of debates on national TV, and on the election night, you either become the president or you go back to your old job.

While in the oval office, you start enjoy the fruit of your success big time with tax payers funded vacations complete with your own chef, butler and a big flying limo.

After you do your time and pay your due in that big boring old building, your earning power takes a big jump the day you walk out of that fortified compound.

Obama did just that and it is time for him to cash in. 

Well, everyone does it why can’t he?

See the number of fingers? Of course I didn’t say a word. I just let my fingers do the talking. Cantor Fitzgerald countered 250. We settleed on 4. Everyone was happy. $400,000.


Billy did it for 250. Hillary, a two-time loser, also pocket 250. Being the first black president and a 2-term president, it is only fair for Obama’s $400,000 engagement fee. Obama once called Wall Street bankers ‘fat cat’ for a reason. A skinny cat just can’t afford $400,000, can he? People who called Obama “hypocrite” are jealous because no fat cat will ever ask them to speak, not even for free.

Let’s be frank, what comes out of Obama’s mouth, isn’t very important. Cantor Fitzgerald doesn’t care much what Obama has to say. People go to that kind of events for one thing and one thing only. It isn’t food. It is the connection they are after.

Cantor Fitzgerald won’t fork out the entire $400,000 either. It is a tax deductible event and tax payers may foot part of the expenses.

Also, don’t expect liberal media will report this because that’s just the way America is. No big deal. 

To hell with the 99%. It’s not Obama’s problem anymore. In fact, it never was. It’s time to enjoy life.

Rule of the law applies to Clintons too January 15, 2017

Posted by hslu in Politics, US Government.
Tags:
add a comment

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/12/andrew-napolitano-why-criminal-investigation-hillary-clinton-is-back-to-front-and-center.html

Any other U.S. citizen caught doing the same thing Hillary Clinton did while in office will be in federal prison for a long time without parole.

Hillary Clinton should face the law too.

Hillary: ‘I did not ……’ August 20, 2015

Posted by hslu in Politics.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Hillary points her finger and says:

image

‘I did not have an unsusal relationship with that server, my private server.’

Did Bill tell you to say that?

Hillary in Trouble August 1, 2015

Posted by hslu in Election, Politics.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Emailgate;
Benghazi investigation/movie;
Campaign in disarray;
Declining poll numbers;
Credibility in doubt;
$200K speaking fees;
Greedy and corrupt;
Top 1%;
Arrogant;
Bill Clinton 3rd term;
Abandoned by liberal media and,

Hillary has a new enemy; Biden?

The perpetual foot-in-the-mouth Biden?

DNC Is sending a message to Hillary and the messagener is Biden.

image

It was Hillary’s election to lose and Hillary has lost it already.

Again.

Obama should resign on Lying to Americans on Benghazi October 25, 2012

Posted by hslu in Global Affair, Islam, Obama, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Obama knew what was going on at Benghazi but chose to blame it on a video and lie to the American people.

Here are the evidences:

7/9/2012

US Ambassador Stevens: “Conditions in Libya hadn’t met “benchmarks” to reduce American security personnel.”

8/2/2012

Ambassador Stevens:

1.     “The security condition in Libya remains unpredictable, volatile, and violent.”

2.     “Host nation security support is lacking and cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment for the diplomatic mission of outreach.”

3.     “Request an additional 11 bodyguards at the U.S. Embassy in the Libyan capital of Tripoli.”

8/8/2012

Ambassador Stevens’s request for additional security was denied by the State Department and the 16-man temporary security team left Libya.

9/5/2012

Obama receives his daily intelligence briefing.

9/6/2012 – 9/10/2012

Obama skipped his daily intelligence briefing because  National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said: “(Obama) is among the most sophisticated consumers of intelligence on the planet.”

9/11/2012

4:05 pm     WH  received email from State Department that “US Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi under attack.” 300 to 400 other people also saw the email.

4:54 pm     WH was told that “the firing… in Benghazi…has stopped….A response team is on site attempting to locate COM (embassy) personnel.””

6:07 pm     White House knew via US embassy in Tripoli that “the Islamic militant group “Ansar al-Sharia claims responsibility for Benghazi Attack.”

9/12/2012

  • Obama skipped his daily intelligence briefing and flew to Las Vegas for fund raising
  • CIA station chief in Libya wrote that “There was evidence that “Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi) was carried out by militants, not a spontaneous mob upset about an American-made video ridiculing Islam’s Prophet Muhammad.
  • Hillary Clinton on Benghazi attack: “How could this happen? How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?”
  • Hillary Clinton: “The U.S. was “working to determine the precise motivations and methods” for the attack and hinted that “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior  . . . . .  as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet.”
  • Hillary Clinton “strongly denounced both the anti-Islam video posted on the Internet that is rousing the angry protests throughout the Mideast and the violence targeting U.S. diplomatic compounds.”
  • Obama at WH White House Rose Garden: “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation . . . . . . “

9/13/2012

Hillary: “found the video “disgusting and reprehensible. It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose to denigrate a great religion and to provoke rage.”

9/16/2012

U.S. Ambassador to UN, Susan Rice, blamed killing on spontaneous protests over an anti-Muslim film, and said on three TV appearances that “we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.”

9/18/2012

WH Press Secretary Jay Carney:

  • “Based on information that we — our initial information … we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a pre-planned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video.”
  • “That is what we know” based on “concrete evidence, not supposition.”

Obama on Letterman:

  • “Here’s what happened. You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who is extremely offensive [sic] video directed at Muhammad and Islam. .  .  . So this caused great offense in much of the Muslim world. But what also happened was extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies, including the one, the consulate in Libya.”

9/23/2012

Obama, on 60 Minutes with Steve Kroft, called terrorist attack against the U.S. “bumps in the road.”

9/25/2012

Obama on Benghazi at UN speech:

  • “That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.”
  • There’s no video that justifies an attack on an embassy.

10/11/2012

Biden: “We weren’t told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there.”

10/19/2012

With Jon Stewart, Obama said: If four Americans get killed, it’s not optimal. We are going to fix it. All of it.”

———————————————————————————————————————–

Here is what actually happened:

After Obama found out Ambassador Stevens and three others were killed by Ansar al-ShariaObama decided that the resurgence of Al Qaeda will hurt his re-election chance. Obama instructed his campaign team to blame the deaths on  the video and got Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton spread the narrative on TV and covered up the truth.

Obama’s rational went like this:

Bin Laden is dead. Al Qaeda is decimated. Gaddafi is dead. Libya is liberated. Democracy flourishes in the Middle East.  Netanyahu has learned his lessons. Iran is still 2 years away from making a nuclear bomb.  The world is the safest ever. No intelligence briefing is needed. Stevens’s death is not optimal. The video is out there. Let’s blame the whole thing on that stupid video. Liberal media will help me spread the narrative. Called Susan and Hillary and let us get our stories straight. I have a campaign to run. I am leaving for Las vegas. Hillary, you are a big girl, You can take the heat.

 October 16, 2012

Hillary Clinton has “taken responsibility” for the deadly security breach at Benghazi, saying the buck stopped with her and not the White House.

There goes Hillary’s chance to run for the president of the U.S. I wonder what Bill Clinton has to say now.

 

No H. R. Clinton in Charlotte, why? September 7, 2012

Posted by hslu in Global Affair, Politics.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

1。 B. Clinton wanted her away so that she won’t be there 妨礙他的好事。

2。 H. Clinton didn’t get along with Obama.

3。 Obama sent her away so people won’t be reminded of the failure of Obama’s foreign policy: Iran, North Korea, Israel and OPEC.

4。 H. Clinton couldn’t stand all the lies exposed by Obama, Clinton and her fellow Democrats.

5。Obama has already decided to get rid of her in his 2nd term.

Bill Clinton Lied. Hillary is no different. January 15, 2011

Posted by hslu in China, Cold War, Congress, Economics, Global Affair, Military, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

A pre-requisite of a politician is be able to lie.

Be able to lie in front of cameras.

Be able to lie with a straight face.

As such, the higher the office, the greater a liar she or she has to be.

Bill Clinton lied. He lied under oath. He lied in front of cameras. He knew he lied.

And he got caught, humiliated and impeached. He got what he deserved unless he liked jail better.

Hillary lied as well. Her lies before the visit of China’s President next Monday are strictly for domestic consumption because China does not believe her or the Obama Administration. She said that the US is not trying to contain China. The US is merely cultivating allies in Asia to help it manage Beijing’s increasingly bold projection of military and economic power.

She is either 睁着眼说瞎话 “zheng1 zhe1 yen3 shui1 xia1 hua4” or, shall we say,  放狗屁 “fang4 gou3 pi4”:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/15/world/asia/15diplo.html?_r=1&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y

The United States is no question the most powerful nation in the world with influences felt every corner of the world: Mid-East, Europe, Americas and Asia.

Except China.

The US treats China as its enemy and a threat to its super power position. It is uniting China’s neighbors; South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam and India; to contain China’s expansion both militarily and economically.

The US is hoping a repeat of the outcome of the Cold War with Russia where a military race with America bankrupted the former Soviet Union.

The United States has lost the economical war to China. In less than 20 years, from 1993 to 2000, the US  has become the biggest debtor nation in the world. The only thing the US has going for it is the US dollar which is used as the reserve currency of the world. That position is slowly being chipped away. When, not if, it happens, all hell breaks lose and the US will be in shit hole so deep that it has no way of getting out ever.

Now, let’s go back to the Cold War between the US and China.

The US wants a Cold War with China. I say:”Let them have it.”

Why?

Because that’s a sure way of bankrupting a nation, especially a nation like the United States.

Yeah, $600 billion per year! $700 billion per year! Why not $800 billion per year?

Let’s the US Congress approves all the weapons the military wants while green back is the king in the world. We are only talking about tax dollars from its citizens.Who cares about the national debt?

The thing is that the $700 billion or $800 billion won’t stimulate the US economy like it used to after the Great Depression. That $700 billion or $800 billion buys a lot of pork, supports a lot of waste and stimulates the economies of other countries where US stations its troops at.

Let the US borrow more money from China and Japan to fund its ambition of being the superpower in the world. It adds no real value to its economy. You can’t eat bullets. You can’t eat air carriers. You can’t eat cruise missiles either. And all that inventories require a lot of money to keep them functioning at all times while the roads, water pipes and infrastructures are crumbling down. They only serve one purpose and one purpose only: maintaining an image of the most powerful nation in the world. Other than that it has no real value except hastens America’s road to bankruptcy.

With all the lies from Clinton, China will not be easily intimidated. And China will do what it plans to do: 5 years at a time.

 

 

Freedom of Speech September 9, 2010

Posted by hslu in Global Affair, Islam, Obama, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

No one gives it a damn  if someone burns an American flag or a bible. That’s freedom of speech, according to the high court.

If someone try to burn a Koran or a bunch of Korans, according to Obama, Hillary, Petraeus and a bunch of others, it becomes a national security issue.

Now Imam Rauf has said that unless the mosque is built at the site in the Lower Manhattan, “The headlines in the Muslim world will be that Islam is under attack.” And, if you read between the lines, American heads here in the US and abroad will roll.

Hmm.., Is that a threat to the American people?

Let’s raise the national security threat level to orange then, Obama.

What does this have to say about the religion of Islam? And more importantly what does this have to say about the mood of American people who have had it up to their eyes with the threats from the so-called religion of the peace.

What I do not understand is:

  • How come the leaders of Arab countries didn’t come out and ask Muslims in the world to tone it down?
  • How come the so-called moderate Imams all over the world  in the world didn’t ask their followers to respect majority of American people’s will?
  • How come the so-called moderate Imams all over the world or Muslim leaders didn’t ask Imam Rauf to move the Cordoba House to a different location?
  • How come Obama didn’t call the leaders of the Muslim countries and tell them that Freedom of Speech is the Law of the land here and is protected by the constitution of the United States?
  • How come Hillary Clinton and Ambassadors to the Muslim countries didn’t call these Muslim nations and educate these Muslim leaders of the American way of life and ask them to come out and ask the radicals, as Imam Rauf has put it, to put their saif, or suicide bombs, down for a change?

Now you see how big a mess Obama did with his”right ot build”  iftar speech in front of many Muslims in the White House. He really kicked it up a notch, didn’t he?

I say Obama is a Muslim in front of other Muslims. At least he acted as a Muslim and seek approval from his fellow Muslim brothers at the White House iftar dinner.
The next day when asked of his comment he tried to have it both ways and said that he didn’t question the “wisdom” of building a mosque so close to ground zero. May I ask you Obama, whose wisdom did you refer to? Surely you didn’t question the wisdom of Muslims, did you?

Are there anyone out there looking for world peace?

Second Cold War has Begun: U. S. vs China August 1, 2010

Posted by hslu in China, Economics, Global Affair, Politics, Taiwan.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

The United States has found a new enemy after Cold War with Soviet Union: China and it is doing all it can to block China’s expansion.

South Korea

The sinking of a South Korean warship has given the United States a perfect excuse to step up its military presence in Far East.

On the face, the target of the joint military exercise with South Korean around the South Korea Sea is Kim Jong-il of North Korea. But everyone knows that the primary target is China.

Japan

In addition to the closer ties with South Korea, the United States also found a perfect reason to keep its military bases in Okinawa despite objections from local residents stemming from among other reasons rapes of Japanese girls and killing of local residents by US soldiers. In the midst of this particular conflict, the obvious victim was the former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama who resigned because he broke his campaign promise of moving US air bases away from the Okinawa Island. Besides two air bases on Okinawa Island, the United States has three other air bases, two naval bases and an Marine base in other parts of Japan. Moreover, the Seventh Fleet of the United States is permanently stationed in Yokosuka including  50–60 ships, 350 aircraft and 60,000 Navy and Marine Corps personnel.

Taiwan

Although Taiwan under President Ma is making closer contacts on the economic front with China, the United states is not going to give up its friendly relationship with this island nation even though the US recognizes it as part of one China. In the end, I think the United States will sell F-16C/D fighter jets to Taiwan as a way to enhance the blockage of China on the eastern front. Although Taiwan becomes a pawn in this continuing struggle, the United States has an upper hand because Taiwan does not want to unify with China yet.

Southeast Asia

Diplomatically, Hillary Clinton last week visited Hanoi to attend a Ministerial meeting and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Regional Forum. This is the second time she has attended these meetings. Clinton said that the United States is committed to being an active partner in the region and advancing shared interests and values. The United States is looking into more opportunities to maintain a closer economic and if warranted military ties with Southeast Asian countries such as Philippines, Indonesia and four lower Mekong River countries: Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. Here, the potential sticky point is the development of South China Sea where exploration and production of hydrocarbon has created some hotly debate

Iraq and Afghanistan

The circle is almost complete with the American military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. Although Obama wants to reduce American’s troops in Afghanistan starting 2011, the fact of the matter is that the US will be there for a long time because Afghan is America’s second Vietnam.

Now that the US has shown its hands, the next move is China’s.

China’s Move

And I have no doubt that China will answer with further expanding its military power and continuing technology development in the ares of fighter jets and air carriers. At this moment, China is no match against the US militarily. However, China has money and the will to develop its military and space technology while the US is buried under back bending deficits and national debt. China’s economy is growing at 10% per year while the US is experiencing anemic recovery and nearly 17% unemployment rate.The United States has dismantled NASA and changed NASA’s mission to making Arabs happy while China is plotting to send a man to moon in 10 years’ time. The United States has put the Mars program on back burner but China is determined to make China a force to be reckoned with. As Chairman Mao famously declared 55 years ago that:

“我们不但要有更多的飞机大炮,而且还要有原子弹。 在今天这个世界上,我们要不受人家欺侮,就不能没有这个东西。

“Not only do we (China) need more air planes and artillery pieces, we also need the atomic bomb.” “In this world today, to avoid being bullied, we cannot be without it.”

Today, in the mind of current Chinese leaders, “这个东西” is space technology and a strong naval force: air carriers and submarines.

In ten years, China’s military force will still be no match to US’s military might. But China will make enough progress to challenge United States’ dominance.

The second Cold War has begun.

Israel vs. America – A new chapter March 13, 2010

Posted by hslu in Global Affair, Obama, Politics, Religion.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

I don’t think Obama likes Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Netanyahu also despises Obama.

American Jews were a bunch of fools when they voted for obama despite his  extremely zealous relationship with  anti-Israel characters like Jeremiah Wright and Rashid Khalidi. They forgot his middle name and believed his words during the presidential campaign. It’s too late for these Jews and they have to wait three more years before anything can be done with this.

The war started immediately after obama took office when he turned his cheek to Arab Muslims. It intensified after he publicly denounced Israel at UN saying that “America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.”

With the announcement by Mr. Netanyahu’s government to construct 1,600 new homes in East Jerusalem, Israel thumbs its nose to obama and tells the U.S. to buzz off.

Poor Hillary Clinton, whose job on Middle East was taken over by George Mitchel, had to play hard ball with Mr. Netanyahu saying that the new settlement had harmed “the bilateral relationship” between America and Israel.

What she forgot to mention was that the relationship has already been damaged by Obama to begin with.

What’s funny about the whole thing was that the announcement was made when Biden was still in Israel who was giving a speech at Tel Aviv University about Obama administration’s “ironclad commitment to Israeli security.”

World peace, anyone?

More like religious war.

%d bloggers like this: